What you're looking at: the clinical foundation of the study — the samples the dogs will smell and the donors they come from.
What to do: set where positive and control samples are sourced; how many times a vial may be reused and when it expires; who qualifies as a donor; who must stay blind; and what makes a run valid or grounds for exclusion.
Why it matters: these choices decide what is physically presented to the dogs and form the evidence that the study was run cleanly. Get the sources and eligibility right and everything downstream holds together.
What you're looking at: the experimental design and the definition of success.
What to do: state the hypothesis and endpoints, choose how many dogs and tests, set what each wheel is made of, decide how positions are randomized, and enter your accuracy targets.
Why it matters: these numbers drive how many samples you need, the statistical power, and the confidence intervals — in other words, whether the study can actually prove its claim.
What you're looking at: how the dogs are trained and how testing runs day to day.
What to do: choose the training method and rewards, the run design (wheel size, spinning, indication), the dog panel, and the length and pace of each phase.
Why it matters: this turns the design into a realistic schedule and protects the data from accidental cueing and scent fatigue — the things that quietly ruin dog-detection studies.
What you're looking at: a live dashboard, not a form — there is nothing here to fill in.
What to do: glance at it as you complete Parts A–C. It shows whether you have enough samples, the number of tests and dogs the design implies, the phase plan, and the rough timeline.
Why it matters: it is your early-warning system — catch a sample shortfall or an unrealistic timeline here, before they become real problems.